Facts/Reliability | Depth of information | Time Investment | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scholarly journal articles | High | High | High | Very narrow (too narrow?) focus. Can be hard to read. |
Books (chapters) | High | High | High to Medium | Good for broad overviews. Time investment depends on how much of the book you read! |
Newspapers/Magazines | High (for facts) | Low | Low | While a reliable newspapers presents facts correctly, they may exhibit a strong bias in how they then interpret those facts. |
Documentary videos | Medium | Medium | Low (multitasking) | Good for overviews, but often have a strong point of view/bias. Meant to be entertaining as well as informative. |
Websites | Varies widely | Medium | Medium | Time gained using familiar format may be lost in evaluating sources or going off on tangents. |
Wikipedia | Medium | Varies widely | Low | Nothing wrong with this for cases where you just need some basic info or overview. Look for links to other sources. |
Social media | Low | Low | Low | Major problems with fake news, but invaluable for what people are thinking or saying. |
Interviews | Medium | Medium | Low | Great for an example of an individual's experiences or thoughts, but may be dangerous to generalize based on one or two. |